Daniel Johns looks like Keira Knightley

This is the kind of revelation you don't want to have (Posted by Sunny Kalsi Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:58:00 GMT)

I’m just watching this special on Silverchair, and I was watching this bit where Daniel Johns is singing on Diorama, and he reminded me of someone, and I wasn’t sure it was a man. Delta Goodrem? No… It was an attractive woman, but an ugly version… Perhaps a very attractive woman… Oh shit it’s Keira Knightley. All my wet dreams will be ruined.

I also just figured out microblogging… throws up

Tags | no comments | no trackbacks

Transformers review

Why write a hateful review when someone else so succintly sums up all your points? (Posted by Sunny Kalsi Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:35:00 GMT)

This is the best review of Transformers I’ve ever seen. The thing about this is, it’s entirely accurate. If my expectations weren’t already so low, I’d probably also cry. The real problem I’ve got is that the guy who voices Optimus Prime is the original prime, and apparently one of the dudes who did the original cartoon (and / or comic) was consulted for the story.

They should both be ashamed.

Tags | no comments | no trackbacks

Why I am smarter than Jeff Atwood

Now that we have a good point of comparison, I can prove that Jeff is a noob (Posted by Sunny Kalsi Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:56:00 GMT)

Jeff Atwood is a Microsoftie, and an idiot. Here’s his article, and here’s mine. Believe it or not, they’re actually about the same thing!

Jeff basically looks at the application and says “Ha! They need a maximise button like Windows”. That’s most of his conclusions: “Do it like Windows, because that’s all I’ve ever used and I’m too much of an idiot to accept anything else.” I on the other hand, go about trying to make the way macs do it better by using a different system, but keeping in the spirit of what Macs do.

I don’t even like macs, but I can still put that aside when thinking about the user interface.

Conclusion: I am awesome, Jeff is a noob. This is the second time I’ll end a blog post like this, and it’ll be as satisfying as the first time:

QED

Tags | 4 comments | no trackbacks

Why I'll never be a good businessman

(Posted by Sunny Kalsi Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:44:11 GMT)

When inviting people to a party you generally start by ringing up a single person, then ringing more. People are generally antithetic to the idea of a party—They don’t want to turn up, but even more than that, they don’t want to miss out. Therefore, the first person you ring is going to ask a dumb-arse question: “Who else is coming?”

It’s easy to see how the question is silly. If everyone asks the question, and they do, then the answer depends on itself. Everyone will come if everyone else is coming. However, given the predicate that people don’t want to make the effort to turn up unless they’re missing out, the question is a direct way to answer that. The question “Who else is coming” is really asking “am I missing out?”. Clearly, if you want to hold a party, the answer is “yes, you are missing out”.

I usually answer with “You’re the first person I’m ringing”. The reply is equally dumb-arse, if not more so: “Ring other people and find out if they’re turning up, then ask me again.” With a lot of wrangling I can get people turning up by making two phone calls per person. Email lists end up.. kinda worse.

The worst thing is, what I’ve figured out above has come from reasoning which has been hard for me to reach. For others it seems almost intuitive: When someone asks “Who else is coming?”, they answer, apparently instinctively, “why, everyone of course!”

There’s one of two reasons here: One is that they’re lying through their teeth. Maybe they’re used to that, maybe they’re completely selfish. However, there’s a fair chance that they know intuitively the silliness of the question and the only way to give the answer.

I’m an engineer. I live in a world of truths. Treading on those truths is a very bad thing, because you have to keep track of so many truths, and manipulate them with logic in such complex ways that messing with that is completely unmanageable. At least, that’s my excuse. If it didn’t make sense it’s probably because it’s a very bad one.

In any case, I find these things very hard to understand, and I’ve only recently been able to draw the line between this and being a businessman – being able to promise something when nothing exists.

I’ve been completely unable to get people to contribute to this site, and the hits it gets is meandering at similar levels to a year ago. Many blogs and many bloggers can gain and keep a pretty hefty readership, and their content is no better than here, but I still don’t get the hits. Perhaps it’s because I’m not promising enough.

Eww.. whiny ending. I guess I’d better eat my pipe now.

Tags | 4 comments | no trackbacks

Ergo Proxy on ABC

(Posted by Sunny Kalsi Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:08:32 GMT)

After showing Cowboy Bebop, the ABC is now showing Ergo Proxy in that time slot. I nearly flipped out when I saw the ad. I don’t think Ergo Proxy is great. It tries too hard to be complicated and sophisticated. The important thing about showing Ergo Proxy on the ABC on what is effectively a “mini adult-swim” is it’s recency. Cowboy Bebop was made in 1999, and is a classic. It’s also been shown on Australian TV before.

Ergo Proxy finished airing at the end of 2006 in japan, making this series more recent than many American series’ that commercial channels are showing. Considering the fact that the ABC is showing the english dub, this is quite a feat.

If it hadn’t already, it’s definitely clinched it now. I’ve said this already, others (err… that article was written by Tim but is accredited to me because I’m an idiot) have said this already, but it’s been proven again: The ABC is far and away the best TV station in Australia. Other than House, Mythbusters, and Top Gear, and OK I admit Ugly Betty, every show I watch is ABC (Media Watch, Dr Who, Catalyst, Good Game, 4 corners, Chaser, etc.)

Am I the only one that’s disheartened by this? Oh well, as long as they get to stay on the air I’m happy.

Tags | no comments | no trackbacks