Archives | Categories | Twitter | Vimeo | Images

On Beauty and Violence

(Posted by Sunny Kalsi Sun, 02 Sep 2007 06:34:00 GMT)

Are boxers merely brawlers? Is beauty only skin deep?

Kuro5hin is a pretty good website, even though despite the quality of writing the content is pretty low-brow. It’s like all the seedy types from Craigslist and Something Awful congregated to start a community blog. However, it tends to give (sometimes) useful insights into a world I’m unfamiliar with. A lot of the time I regret reading these articles, thinking things like “I really didn’t need to know about 80 year old pick-up artists. I think I’m going to be sick on so many levels”.

Recently I read an article about Miss Teen USA on Kuro5hin, specifically Miss Teen South Carolina, who when asked a relatively simple question turned into a malfunctioning ELIZA bot. The arguement goes a little something like this:

  • What happened is completely natural,
  • Just like when Mike Tyson bit off Evander Holyfield ear and everyone flipped out, because
  • Boxers are violent, and behind the veneer of propriety they’re really just brawlers.
  • Beautiful women are stupid, because behind the veneer of propriety the competition is really about “hot chicks”.

This makes me angry for two reasons. First, I used to do a martial art (which Nathan still does, I think), and I never thought it was about hurting others. In fact, the atmosphere was always positive, and about taking care of each other, and trying to improve ourselves physically and mentally. Despite the fact that during sparring, sometimes we got physical, the intention wasn’t to injure, but to play. I’d compare it more to a sport than violent activity.

So if Rugby and Chess are about being bloodthirsty, then sure, so is boxing. After all, things get heated in Rugby as well, and fights break out, but they’re clearly outside the rules. Chess too, is about killing, but ultimately, the game is still a game, just like Rugby, just like boxing.

The second reason is the assumption that just because someone is beautiful, they’re stupid. More specifically, just because someone’s physically attractive, they must be stupid. This isn’t like D&D where you get a certain number of stats and overall everyone’s the same. Some people are attractive and intelligent. Shocking, maybe, but true. At the very least, there’s no way to prove that the physically attractive are stupid, and I don’t think there’s any strong supporting evidence either.

The “game” of “Miss Teen USA” tries to optimise on both intelligence and phyisical attractiveness (it may do so badly, but then rules-wise soccer is a complete waste of time as well). I don’t think Miss Teen SC won that competition, even though she may have done everything else right. I’m also pretty sure there’s plenty very intelligent, physically attractive women in South Carolina who merely didn’t enter Miss Teen SC, so this noob won out. We should be outraged (at least, laughing), just like when Tyson bit of Holyfield’s ear.

| 5 comments | no trackbacks

Strange Popularity

(Posted by Michael O'Ryan Sat, 01 Sep 2007 07:26:00 GMT)

As Sunny has said in a comment a while back my name is the most popular search result which directs people to this site. It’s kinda weird and cool at the same time.

I was looking at my flickr account and took notice at the most viewed images on my account. It seems for some reason the most popular image on my account is a picture of houses out of my bedroom window.

Suburbia

And because I still can I took another picture today at the same angle, zoom, etc,…

Suburbia 2

As a side note both pictures are only reduced in size. There is no cropping or anything else. I may however take another one tomorrow morning so the lighting is similar.

It’s also kinda sad that I took my most popular/viewed picture within 48 hours of buying my camera. Not only that but it only took a single attempt.

For an encore I’ve decided that I’m going to spend 20 minutes writing something about m-theory. No wait a self “help” book and send it to Oprah. I’ll be Rich!

| no comments | no trackbacks